Different species of bees tend to have different social behaviours. On the low end of the sociality spectrum and native to British Columbia, is the mason bee. On the other hand, our honeybees Apis Mellifera are an eusocial species of bee. Which means, much like the adorable bumblebee and ferocious killer bees, they form highly complex societies.
They represent true sociality or eusociality, which is the highest degree of being social. In comparison, while we, as humans, are definitely social just ask Facebook! We are considered to be presocial. Eusociality is the phenomenon in which a single caste of reproductive females usually only one member produce offspring and a non-reproductive caste cooperatively raise and care for the offspring.
To be considered eusocial, the colony of a species must have overlapping generations, cooperative brood care and reproductive division of labour by a sterile worker caste.
Both the ecological and the haplo-diploidy hypotheses likely play a role in the evolution of eusociality. To learn more about our GDPR policies click here. If you want more info regarding data storage, please contact gdpr jove. Your access has now expired. Provide feedback to your librarian. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to our customer success team.
Login processing Social Organization Varying levels of social organization are observed within the animal kingdom, ranging from simple to highly complex. Eusociality Not every species that exhibits altruistic behavior is considered eusocial. Further Reading: Sun, Q. Krasnec, M. Breed Meunier, J. Holland, J. Please enter your institutional email to check if you have access to this content. Please create an account to get access. Forgot Password? Please enter your email address so we may send you a link to reset your password.
To request a trial, please fill out the form below. A JoVE representative will be in touch with you shortly. You have already requested a trial and a JoVE representative will be in touch with you shortly. If you need immediate assistance, please email us at subscriptions jove. It is important to note that they are not mutually exclusive — each may play a different role in the evolution of eusociality in different groups Figure 4.
What follows is a brief description of major contributing factors during the inception of eusocial behavior. There are two routes by which a gene can promote copies of itself in future generations: directly, through producing offspring, and indirectly, through the reproduction of close relatives.
The sum of direct and indirect reproductive gains is known as inclusive fitness. As a result, it is possible for selection of eusociality over solitary behavior if indirect fitness levels exceed direct fitness. An altruistic act is one which benefits a recipient at a cost to the performer of the act. Hamilton's rule Hamilton states that altruism is favored if. The coefficient of relatedness, r , ranges from 0 to 1 and is the proportion of alleles shared between two individuals identical by descent.
Eusociality depends on high levels of altruism within groups as individuals increase the fitness of others at a cost to themselves e. There are two well-known mechanisms by which r can be elevated: haplodiploid sex determination and inbreeding. While is it not required for eusociality to evolve naked mole rats and termites are diplodiploid , haplodiploidy may help to explain why eusociality has arisen multiple times within the Hymenoptera.
Inbreeding, or mating between close relatives, results in offspring which share a larger proportion of alleles, thus increasing r. This is common in organisms which don't disperse very long distances from the natal nest or are prone to mating with siblings e. An intermediate step toward eusociality may have "hopeful reproductives" — that, workers which have the option to stay and help or to go out start their own nest.
The decision can depend on hierarchical position within the group, territory, or food resources and other environmental conditions. Florida scrub jay offspring are known to stay at the natal nest Breininger et al. Natural selection can occur at the level of the individual, family related individuals, known as kin , or group non-related individuals. This is known as multi-level selection. For eusocial organisms, the traits phenotype of the colony interact with the environment to determine colony-level fitness and can be described with models of multi-level or trait-group selection.
Robin Owen succinctly writes: "Ultimately, the unfolding of the evolutionary process entails selection on the genotypes of the founding female of the colony and her mates, operating through colony traits determines by the genotypes of the worker offspring they produce". Nesting behavior has been described as a possible prerequisite for the development of eusociality, in large part since it creates situations conducive to cooperative brood care Anderson In the case of termites, thrips, shrimp, and aphids, the protected nest is also the location of food in a patchy environment.
Parental care can also be an important life history component. One path to eusociality in Hymenoptera is thought to start with solitary females engaging in simultaneous progressive provisioning — rearing multiple larvae of different ages at the same time Field Transitioning to eusocial behavior would then incorporate remaining offspring and provisioning siblings, followed by offspring withholding their own reproduction.
In , the first eusocial insect genome sequence Apis mellifera was completed, beginning a new era of "sociogenomics" Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium , Robinson et al. Sequencing is underway for several species of ants Smith et al. Central to the concept of eusociality is division of labor. Advanced eusocial species take this further than simply task differences but have different morphological castes.
The interplay between genetic and environmental contributions to caste is being unraveled in several species Schwander et al. There is a species with genetically distinct mitochondrial lineages derived from hybrid genomes from two species, P.
Queens must mate with males of both lineages, since workers are produced from between-lineage matings and reproductives are from within-lineage matings Suni et al. Sometimes referred to as "swarm intelligence" Bonabeau et al. Without central leadership, groups rely on self-organized processes Seeley involving consensus-building to find nests Pratt , Seeley et al.
Social insects provide excellent inspiration for the burgeoning field of biomimicry, wherein everything from task allocation Krieger et al. Adams, E. Territory size and population limits in mangrove termites. Journal of Animal Ecology 56 , — Territory defense by the ant Azteca trigona : maintenance of an arboreal ant mosaic. Oecologia 97 , — Anderson, M. The evolution of eusociality.
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 15 , — Aoki, S. Factors affecting the proportion of sterile soldiers in growing aphid colonies. Population Ecology 47 , — Beckers, R. Collective decision making through food recruitment.
Insectes Sociaux 37 , — Bonabeau, E. Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour. Nature , 39—42 Breininger, D. A model-selection approach to predicting whether Florida scrub-jays delay breeding. Condor , — Burda, H. Are naked and common mole-rats eusocial, and if so, why? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 47 , — Bygott, J. Male lions in large coalitions gain reproductive advantages. Nature , — Ciszek, D.
New colony formation in the "highly inbred" eusocial naked mole-rat: outbreeding is preferred. Behavioral Ecology 11 , 1—6 Crespi, B. Ecology and evolution of galling thrips and their allies. Annual Review of Entomology 42 , 51—71 Darwin, C. London, UK: John Murray, Duffy, J. Multiple origins of eusociality among sponge-dwelling shrimps Synalpheus. Evolution 54 , — Field, J. The evolution of progressive provisioning.
Behavioral Ecology 16 , — Franks, N. The blind leading the blind in army ant raid patterns: testing a model of self-organization Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Journal of insect Behavior 4 , — Gardener, A. Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22 , — Hamilton, W.
Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior I. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7 , 1—16 Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology 32 , — Helms Cahan, S. Complex hybrid origin of genetic caste determination in harvester ants. Holbrook, C. Social insects inspire human design. Biology Letters 6 , — Territorial strategies in ants.
Science , — The Ants.
0コメント